Why Workday Sucks So Bad and Other ATS Frustrations That Are Crushing Your Job Search Soul
- Luna Rae
- Sep 30
- 5 min read
Don't have time to read the whole article? Here's the quick hits: Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) like Workday are outdated, biased systems that ghost talented candidates and make job searching feel like digital torture. These platforms weren't built for people to enjoy - they were built for HR departments to process applications like cattle. But here's the thing: your career potential shouldn't be determined by whether a robot can read your resume.
-- Luna
The Workday Nightmare: When Job Applications Feel Like Digital Torture
Let's be real... If you've job searched recently, you've probably rage-quit at least one Workday application. You know the drill: spend 30 minutes crafting your resume to the job and uploading it, only to manually re-enter every single detail because their system gets confused by basic formatting. It's like having to do double work for a lazy robot. Spoiler alert: if your vocab and language doesn't meet the shadowy HR who programmed it - you don't match and you're not a good fit according to the algorithm.
Workday, along with other major ATS platforms like Taleo and iCIMS, represents everything that's broken about modern hiring. These systems were designed in the early 2000s when flip phones were cutting-edge technology, and they've barely evolved since. They're the digital equivalent of trying to fit a square peg into a round hole - except the peg is your unique talents and the hole is a standardized box that doesn't actually fit anyone.
Why ATS Platforms Are Absolutely Failing You (It's Not Your Fault)
The Resume Black Hole Effect
Ever wonder why 78% of your applications disappear into the void? ATS systems are notorious for filtering out qualified candidates before human eyes ever see their applications. These platforms use keyword matching algorithms that are about as sophisticated as a 2005 search engine. Miss the exact phrase "customer service" and use "client relations" instead? Boom! Rejected by a robot that's never worked a day in customer service.
The Bias Problem No One Talks About
Here's what companies won't tell you: ATS system perpetuate hiring bias on a massive scale. These platforms favor certain resume formats, education backgrounds, and even names. Studies show that resumes with "white-sounding" names receive 50% more callbacks than identical resumes with ethnic names. When your first impression is filtered through a biased algorithm, fairness goes out the window before you've even started.
Technical Glitches Cost You Opportunities
Workday's interface feels like it was designed by someone who's never actually applied for a job. The platform frequently crashes mid-application, loses your progress, and has the user experience of a government website from 1998. You shouldn't need a computer science degree to apply for a marketing internship, but here we are.
The Hidden Costs of ATS Platforms
Time Theft on a Massive Scale
The average job application through an ATS takes 30-45 minutes. Multiply that by the hundreds of applications you'll submit, and you're looking at weeks of your life spent fighting with broken technology instead of showcasing your actual skills. That's time you could spend building your portfolio, networking, or literally anything more productive than reformatting your resume for the 47th time.
[Image suggestion: Clock graphic showing time wasted on ATS applications vs. time spent on meaningful career development activities]
Mental Health Impact
Let's talk about the psychological toll. Constantly having your qualifications filtered by emotionless algorithms creates a sense of powerlessness that's genuinely damaging. When qualified candidates get rejected by systems before humans even see their potential, it's not just inefficient—it's dehumanizing.
What Companies Are Really Doing to Your Applications
Most employers using ATS systems set their filters so restrictively that they eliminate 75% of applications automatically. They're not looking for the best candidates; they're looking for applications that happen to game their broken system correctly. It's like hiring a chef based on whether they can solve a math equation instead of whether they can actually cook.
The dirty secret? Many hiring managers know their ATS sucks, but they're stuck with company-wide contracts and IT departments that resist change. You're not failing the system—the system is failing you.
Why This Matters To Jobseekers
This isn't just about inconvenient technology—it's about your future. When broken ATS systems stand between you and meaningful career opportunities, they're literally impacting your earning potential, professional growth, and life trajectory. Every qualified candidate filtered out by faulty algorithms represents lost innovation, missed connections, and talent going to waste.
You deserve a hiring process that recognizes your potential, not one that reduces you to keyword density. Your career shouldn't depend on whether you can outsmart a decade-old algorithm that was never designed with your success in mind.
The enterN Difference: Rewiring Hiring
This is exactly why we're building enterN differently. Traditional hiring platforms put the convenience of a lighter workload for recruiters and HR above user experience and applicants actual potential. These systems are perpetuating some of the biggest bias in the hiring process - and for the most part it goes unseen.
We load our platform with responsiveness scores - so that you know that connections don't end up in black holes when there is a match. Our professional DNA summary removes the need for a resume entirely, and uses bias-resistant ranking that evaluates actual potential, not whether you used the right buzzwords.
Instead of forcing you through standardized forms with non-standard data to be input, our preference-based profiles let you showcase what makes you unique in about 15 minutes - and the best part is you only have to do it one time. This, coupled with our mutual-interest system means you only invest time in opportunities where there's genuine, two-way interest - no more one sided applications to companies that were never going to consider you anyway.
Faster. Fairer. Frictionless. We're not just another job board - we're the anti-ATS platform that actually works for Gen Z and beyond.
Small Changes, Big Impact
The current hiring system is fundamentally broken, designed for corporate convenience rather than human potential. But here's what they don't want you to know: your worth isn't determined by an algorithm's ability to parse your resume. You are more than keywords, more than formatted bullet points, more than a standardized application form.
Your talents, creativity, and potential can't be captured by systems built for a different era. The future of hiring is human-centered, bias-resistant, and built for your generation. You don't need to play by broken rules—you need platforms that recognize your actual value.
Want to work with employers who actually care about fairness?
Join the waitlist at: https://www.enter-n.com/ and be the first to access a hiring platform that eliminates bias, ghosting, and application black holes.
Want to learn more about this topic?
https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-acquisition/how-applicant-tracking-systems-work | How Applicant Tracking Systems Work, LinkedIn Talent Solutions
https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/finding-a-job/ats-resume-format | ATS Resume Format: How to Beat Applicant Tracking Systems, Indeed Career Guide
The Recruiting Brainfood Podcast - "The ATS Problem: Why Technology Is Failing Talent" (Episode discussing systemic issues in recruitment technology)
"The Talent Fix: A Leader's Guide to Recruiting Great Talent" by Tim Sackett - Explores how broken hiring systems impact both candidates and companies
@careercontessa on TikTok - Consistently breaks down ATS frustrations and provides actionable job search advice for Gen Z professionals
Comments