The Hidden Cost of Employer Ghosting: Why Each Ignored Candidate Costs Your Company $125-200

How a lack of candidate communication is quietly draining your recruiting budget and damaging your employer brand

Picture this: Your hiring manager just found the "perfect" candidate for an open position. But after three rounds of interviews and weeks of deliberation, they decide to go with someone else. What happens to that promising candidate who invested hours preparing for interviews and rearranging their schedule? Too often, they simply never hear back.

Welcome to the world of employer ghosting—a practice that's become so common that 48% of job seekers report being ghosted by an employer in the past year, up from 38% the previous year. While many organizations dismiss this as a minor communication oversight, the reality is far more costly than most realize.

The Real Price Tag of Radio Silence

Based on comprehensive analysis of current recruitment data, each employer ghosting incident carries a conservative cost of $125-200. This isn't just about hurt feelings—it's about real money walking out your door, and the bill is higher than you think.

Breaking Down the Ghosting Cost Structure

1. Job Advertising Costs: $15-25 per incident

Every ghosted candidate represents a portion of your advertising investment that yielded no return. LinkedIn promoted job posts average $2-3 per click, while Indeed's pay-per-click pricing varies based on role competitiveness and location. Most employers spread their advertising budget across multiple platforms, and each candidate who walks away represents a lost portion of that investment in building your applicant pipeline.

2. Recruiter and HR Time Investment: $45-75 per incident

This represents the largest component of ghosting costs. With average recruiter hourly rates ranging from $27-30, and talent acquisition specialists spending approximately 30 hours on average when successfully hiring an employee, even a small portion adds up quickly.

For each ghosted candidate, recruiters typically invest 1.5-2.5 hours in initial screening, scheduling, interview coordination, and follow-up communications. Add in the wasted interview preparation time and calendar coordination, and you're looking at significant labor costs with zero return on investment.

3. Lost Customer Acquisition Value: $20-35 per incident

With the average cost per hire reaching $4,700 in 2023 and average hires per recruiter falling to just 3.9 (down 54% from the previous year), each ghosted candidate represents lost investment in building a sustainable applicant pipeline. When candidates have negative experiences, you're not just losing one potential hire—you're losing future applications and referrals.

4. Employer Brand and NPS Impact: $25-40 per incident

Here's where ghosting costs extend far beyond the immediate hiring process. 55% of candidates who feel mistreated during the hiring process share their negative experience with others. In today's connected world, that means potential damage to your employer brand that could take years to repair.

Companies with higher organizational health scores outperform peers by up to 3x in shareholder returns, and employer reputation plays a crucial role in that equation. Every ghosted candidate is a potential negative review on Glassdoor, a cautionary tale shared with their professional network, or a discouraging social media post.

5. Impact on Future Applications: $20-25 per incident

Research shows that greater communication with recruiters makes candidates less likely to ghost employers in return. Candidates who receive proper communication and closure are significantly more willing to apply at the same company again or refer qualified contacts.

Conversely, ghosted candidates become much less likely to reapply or recommend your organization to others, effectively shrinking your future talent pool.

The Scope of the Problem

The statistics paint a troubling picture of how pervasive employer ghosting has become:

• 61% of job seekers have been ghosted after a job interview—a nine percentage point increase since April 2024

• 40% of job seekers report being ghosted after second- or third-round interviews

• Only 20% of hiring managers say they never ghost candidates

• 81% of managers cite "uncertainty about the best candidate" as the most common reason for ghosting

This isn't just a problem for entry-level positions. High-level candidates who've invested significant time in multiple interview rounds are experiencing ghosting at alarming rates, potentially costing companies access to top talent.

Why Our $125-200 Estimate Is Conservative

Our cost range represents a conservative estimate for several reasons:

• Lower-end salary calculations: We used modest hourly rates for recruiters and HR professionals

• Minimal time investment assumptions: Many specialized positions require significantly more recruiter time per candidate

• No industry premiums: Costs for technical, executive, or specialized roles are typically much higher

• Excluded intangible impacts: We didn't quantify effects on team morale, hiring manager reputation, or long-term brand damage

For specialized roles, competitive markets, or companies with high hiring volumes, the true cost could easily reach $300-500+ per ghosting incident when factoring in opportunity costs and long-term brand damage.

The Ripple Effect Beyond Direct Costs

The financial impact of employer ghosting extends well beyond the immediate costs outlined above. Consider these additional consequences:

Increased recruitment timeline: When employer brand suffers, it takes longer to attract quality candidates, extending time-to-fill and increasing indirect costs.

Higher salary requirements: Companies with poor candidate experience reputation often need to offer higher compensation to attract top talent.

Reduced employee referrals: Current employees become less likely to refer contacts when they know the company has a reputation for poor candidate treatment.

Legal and compliance risks: In some jurisdictions, failure to communicate with candidates can create legal exposure, particularly around equal opportunity requirements.

Turning the Tide: Building a Communication-First Culture

The good news? This is entirely preventable. Organizations that prioritize candidate communication not only avoid these costs but often see measurable improvements in their recruiting effectiveness.

Simple solutions with big impact:

• Automated status updates: Simple email templates can keep candidates informed at each stage

• Clear timeline communication: Set expectations upfront about decision timelines

• Personalized rejection messages: A brief, personal note goes much further than generic communications

• Feedback opportunities: Offering constructive feedback, when possible, turns rejection into relationship building

The investment pays off: Companies that maintain strong candidate communication see higher application rates, improved employer brand scores, and reduced time-to-fill across their open positions.

The Bottom Line

At a conservative $125-200 per incident, employer ghosting isn't just a candidate experience issue—it's a significant financial drain on recruiting budgets. For a company that ghosts just 50 candidates per year (a modest number for most organizations), that's $6,250-10,000 in direct costs, not including the long-term brand damage.

In today's competitive talent market, organizations can't afford to treat candidates as disposable. Every interaction is an opportunity to build your employer brand, expand your talent network, and demonstrate the professionalism that top candidates expect.

The question isn't whether you can afford to improve candidate communication—it's whether you can afford not to.

---

Looking to reduce your recruiting costs and improve candidate experience? Start by auditing your current communication practices and implementing simple automated updates for candidates at each stage of your hiring process. The investment in better communication will pay dividends in reduced costs and improved employer brand.